=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 07:51:16 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         "R. Bentz Kirby" <bocelts@SCSN.NET>

Organization: Law Office of R. Bentz Kirby

Subject:      Jerry Cimino's posts

 

Dear Beat List:

 

I just signed on to this list a few days ago, but it seems like a year

ago.  The range of emotions has soared and dipped me like I am the

finest of fighter jet plane on an evasive maneuver in the mountains.  I

have pulled from my shelf books that have lain dormant for years and

found within them joy and tears that I thought had long since left me.

To find that I am still in touch with them cuts both ways like a knife.

I hope that Ferlinghetti will be in the store to have coffee with me and

I will bask in the glow of a fire lit in me by Homer and fed by the

Legends of King Authur, the story of Ivanhoe (sp), Jason and the search

for the Fleece, the story of Jesus, Catch 22, Ferlinghetti, Corso,

Thomas Wolfe, Jack Kerouac, Gerry Nicosia, Allen Ginsburg, Bob Dylan,

Thoreau, Van Morrison, etc. etc. etc.   While I admired Ann's biography

of Kerouac and read it first, I wonder how any person can say that

Nicosia has written the best, or at least one of the two best

biographies of Kerouac.

 

I would say that it is the best, but will admit that others might prefer

Charter's because it is more flattering, but to me Memory Babe has the

most facts and the most Love in it.  Regardless, I am honored to be a

member of a list with Gerry Nicosia.  I have also seen messages going

back and forth between Levi Asher and Gerry.  I have looked at Levi's

site and find it to be a great web site.  One of the best.  But, Levi

has yet to answer Gerry's direct questions.  Why is that?

 

I have just read the first in a series of posts by Jerry Cimino about

the list and Gerry.  I tend to agree.  When I first signed on I asked

several questions that have gone unanswered.  One of those troubles me

greatly.

 

1.    In an email response to Gerry, someone asked an open question that

to me said in paraphrased terms:

 

What about Gerry Nicosia, isn't he a thief because he has sold

photocopies of Kerouac's letters for profit?

 

I responded to the list and to the poster, whose id I have forgotten,

what letters, where, to whom and how much.  I have not heard, nor has

this list heard yet what letters to whom and how much.

 

If one is not willing to stand behind such an accusation, or if one

lacks the facts to back it up, one should not accuse another, especially

a writer of the integrity of Nicosia of this behavior.

 

2.    There also was a statement by someone to this lists claiming that

Sampas has not sold off piece meal portions  of  Kerouac's works and

artifacts.  Does anyone actually know what Sampas has done.  I asked the

question and all I received was a chastisement that I should "do my

homework" or some such and stating that I needed to spell Sampas' name

right.  But have I received an answer to the question.  Who knows what

Sampas has done and what he has sold?  No, I have not seen any such

information forthcoming.

 

In short, why does Gerry Nicosia post facts and the others respond with

accusations and no facts.  I am down with Cimino's post.  I am off to

take my children to school, and will respond further in a few minutes

with other points about what I have seen.

 

Peace,

 

--

Bentz

bocelts@scsn.net

 

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:47:25 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         "R. Bentz Kirby" <bocelts@SCSN.NET>

Organization: Law Office of R. Bentz Kirby

Subject:      Kerouac's baseball league

 

Just a thought, but on reading Levi Asher's page on Jack, was he the

sole member of the first fantasy baseball league?

 

Peace,

 

--

Bentz

bocelts@scsn.net

 

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:53:53 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         "R. Bentz Kirby" <bocelts@SCSN.NET>

Organization: Law Office of R. Bentz Kirby

Subject:      Star Trek is not beat

 

David,

 

Star Trek is not beat.  It is an extension of society.  It is more of a

world vision in which Orwell and others are wrong and big brother turns

out to be  nice guy after all.

 

Star Wars comes closer to beat, but at best it was maybe Hip or even

Hep.

 

To me, Space Balls (Mel Brooks?) was beat!  Or, that Outer Limitsor

Twilight Zone where the people got on the space ship and the man then

figures out that the book th aliens brought is a Cook Book.  That is

hip.  And maybe just maybe Beat and space would be say, The Day the

Earth Stood Still.

 

Peace,

 

--

Bentz

bocelts@scsn.net

 

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:55:09 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         "R. Bentz Kirby" <bocelts@SCSN.NET>

Organization: Law Office of R. Bentz Kirby

Subject:      correction

 

I said in my addled brain, but not in the message and hereby correct it

to state:

 

I wonder how any person can say that Nicosia has NOT written the best,

or at least one of the two best biographies of Kerouac.

 

The omission of three letters can affect the meaning.

 

I believe Gerry's is the best, because it is full of love and

tenderness, but does not avoid any difficult issues.  Others will see

Ann's as the best I am sure.  But, anyone else is merely a pretender and

does not approach those two.

 

So, does Ms Charters post here?  If not, does anyone know her?  Invite

her to join the list.  I get jazzed thinking about Charters and Nicosia

debating the beats and Kerouac.  But, remember Nicosia had the courage

to come here and is a blessing to us out of a Gone World.

 

I remember years ago a law professor speaking somewhat contemptuously of

his colleagues who did not publish.  I thought he was just jealous

because they had tenure and did not publish much (he had tenure too, but

worked much harder than they did).  I asked him why and he said that if

you are not willing to put your ideas into the public arena and have

them ripped to shreds by your colleagues, then you are intelletually

dishonest and are a coward as that is the way you learn.

 

Now, I am not saying that Ann Charters or John Sampas has to post their

ideas here.  What I am saying is that, regardless of the rest of it all,

Nicosia is a man of courage and conviction.  He may be looney as a nut

cake, fruit cake or whatever that device is, but he puts his ideas forth

and allows you do dissect him.  And from my experience on the net and

newsgroups, you will be dissected by idiots and genius.  He has cast

pearls, it is up to the list to ensure that he did not cast them before

swine.

 

He is courageous.  I have discouraged him because:

 

1.    He can't argue with people who do not state facts.

2.    If he has been slandered, then it is best to leave it to the

lawyers.  (Hey, I got a plug for me in here too!!! ;-))

3.    It must be very distracting to him to have to deal with bs, and he

needs to be about his life's work.

4.    I would rather not see him expose his soul on public, as I don't

know who this public is.

 

But, even though his obvious anger makes me feel that he is wasting his

effort on those who do not deserve it, I admire his candor and

willingness.  Are those who speak less than well up to the task to be so

honest and to expose themselves to the same criticism, are they willing

to be dissected in such detail?  Where are their facts?

 

I for one count us to be very rich for Gerry's presence here, would

welcome Ann aboard if she would join and say, if you are unwilling to

back up an attack on Gerry or a defense of Sampas without facts, then

keep it to yourself because Nicosia has stated facts.

 

Peace,

 

--

Bentz

bocelts@scsn.net

 

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:26:59 -0500

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         RACE --- <race@MIDUSA.NET>

Subject:      Re: Jerry Cimino's posts

 

RBK,

 

We're not always the best hosts when it comes to newcomers.  This thread

is not the only example of when that has happened.  The emotional level

though may explain why our hosting is particularly poor.

 

There is a range of emotions involved in this thread - not only those

concerning a hotly contested legal argument being discussed in a

non-legal environment - but also the emotions of grief involved in close

friendships on both sides of what has politely been referred to as a

"feud" and at times compared to a "war".

>

> I just signed on to this list a few days ago, but it seems like a year

> ago.  The range of emotions has soared and dipped me like I am the

> finest of fighter jet plane on an evasive maneuver in the mountains.  I

> have pulled from my shelf books that have lain dormant for years and

> found within them joy and tears that I thought had long since left me.

> To find that I am still in touch with them cuts both ways like a knife.

> I hope that Ferlinghetti will be in the store to have coffee with me and

> I will bask in the glow of a fire lit in me by Homer and fed by the

> Legends of King Authur, the story of Ivanhoe (sp), Jason and the search

> for the Fleece, the story of Jesus, Catch 22, Ferlinghetti, Corso,

> Thomas Wolfe, Jack Kerouac, Gerry Nicosia, Allen Ginsburg, Bob Dylan,

> Thoreau, Van Morrison, etc. etc. etc.

 

It seems to me that these remembrances are wonderful feelings and

connections and fairly appropriate to a Memorial Day Celebration of

Beat-ism.  I find myself as a fairly newcomer to both the scene, the

list, and the literature - manically trying to read more and more and

more to get a better sense of the IT that runs through all of these

words.  But it is a smooth mania for me and one that I can enjoy quite

well.

 

While I admired Ann's biography

> of Kerouac and read it first, I wonder how any person can say that

> Nicosia has written the best, or at least one of the two best

> biographies of Kerouac.

 

I think they are both wonderful.  I'm reading them both right now along

with Dharma Lion about Ginsberg.  Charters' is a much more empathetic

style and Nicosia's a more detached one.  The two in combination is

something of a symphony for me.  I don't know why all the ratings need

be done at all.  The books say the same thing almost only they say

completely different things at the same time.  They are both wonderful

tributes to Kerouac.  As was McNally's which was a different style

altogether almost intimate anthropological in nature.  I'm looking

forward to others that have been mentioned as well.

>

> I would say that it is the best, but will admit that others might prefer

> Charter's because it is more flattering, but to me Memory Babe has the

> most facts and the most Love in it.  Regardless, I am honored to be a

> member of a list with Gerry Nicosia.

 

He is a wonderful resource.  When he has time to discuss matters

off-estate, i find his insights beautiful to read.  I can't wait for the

Vietnam Vets book.  I'm certain that he will tell that story and its

many plots with incredible technique.

 

All that said, i have to admit that I'm somewhat tired of the estate

discussion.  It seems an important thread but not incredibly significant

to me.  None of the libraries under consideration are ones I will ever

be near - i doubt.  I doubt that I will ever return to the "scholarly

arena".  I respect the desire of scholars to desire an archive like the

one suggested for the NYPL, but it doesn't seem to be the only audience

for Kerowhackos around this beautiful land.

 

I have also seen messages going

> back and forth between Levi Asher and Gerry.  I have looked at Levi's

> site and find it to be a great web site.  One of the best.  But, Levi

> has yet to answer Gerry's direct questions.  Why is that?

 

Have to ask Levi.  I thought that some of the questions were answered

but the answers were unacceptable to Gerry and so it went ....

>

> I have just read the first in a series of posts by Jerry Cimino about

> the list and Gerry.  I tend to agree.  When I first signed on I asked

> several questions that have gone unanswered.  One of those troubles me

> greatly.

>

> 1.    In an email response to Gerry, someone asked an open question that

> to me said in paraphrased terms:

>

> What about Gerry Nicosia, isn't he a thief because he has sold

> photocopies of Kerouac's letters for profit?

 

as i recall, the photocopy letter originally was a bad joke in the

middle of a post.  that's how i read it at least.  it has since blew up.

 

>

> I responded to the list and to the poster, whose id I have forgotten,

> what letters, where, to whom and how much.  I have not heard, nor has

> this list heard yet what letters to whom and how much.

 

it would be letters in the Lowell archive as far as I can tell.  letters

associated with the Memory Babe biography.  i think that the price

sounded reasonable considering Gerry's expenses in working on the book.

>

> If one is not willing to stand behind such an accusation, or if one

> lacks the facts to back it up, one should not accuse another, especially

> a writer of the integrity of Nicosia of this behavior.

 

i think it was a poor joke that wouldn't die.  but that's my failing

memory.

>

> 2.    There also was a statement by someone to this lists claiming that

> Sampas has not sold off piece meal portions  of  Kerouac's works and

> artifacts.  Does anyone actually know what Sampas has done.  I asked the

> question and all I received was a chastisement that I should "do my

> homework" or some such and stating that I needed to spell Sampas' name

> right.  But have I received an answer to the question.  Who knows what

> Sampas has done and what he has sold?  No, I have not seen any such

> information forthcoming.

 

I've learned to have some difficulty with this part of the whole feud.

It seems that until the courts determine otherwise - which is uncertain

at best - that this stuff is Sampas' private property.  I don't think

he's accountable to any of us concerning what he does with his

property.  He could have a huge garage sale - like the Kennedy children

- but it doesn't sound as though that has happened.

 

>

> In short, why does Gerry Nicosia post facts and the others respond with

> accusations and no facts.  I am down with Cimino's post.  I am off to

> take my children to school, and will respond further in a few minutes

> with other points about what I have seen.

 

My impression is that Gerry while an excellent scholar and writer is not

willing to see any grain of truth in anything in this besides his

viewpoint.  That is merely an impression.  My impression is that people

don't post anything worthwhile because, it won't be good enough for

Gerry if they do.  And when they do, there is often at least innuendo

that John Sampas is pulling their strings like puppets.

 

The dialogue in this thread has broken down from both sides and every

angle in-between.  My impression is it is a case of emotionally charged

true believers involved in a fairly messy and intricate legal action and

that the animosity will probably not end after the legal action or

actions are decided.  It will be one for the literary historians to

write about some day down the road.

 

I hope that i've filled in some of the details.  I am very hesitant to

do so for fear of being attacked for having provided misinformation.

These are what I've gathered from the thread, my impressions of the

thread, information as I recall it now, and i don't know that they

necessarily have any correspondence with the truth (whatever that is)...

 

david rhaesa

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:31:30 -0500

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         RACE --- <race@MIDUSA.NET>

Subject:      Re: correction

 

R. Bentz Kirby wrote:

>

> I said in my addled brain, but not in the message and hereby correct it

> to state:

>

> I wonder how any person can say that Nicosia has NOT written the best,

> or at least one of the two best biographies of Kerouac.

>

> The omission of three letters can affect the meaning.

>

 

As one of the most addled brains on the planet it was easy to read past

the addled-typo and understand the context.  i really don't think anyone

suggests Nicosia is not an incredible scholar.  When I read his

biography I say "Wow - how'd he find that out - in my head a lot".  In

the others, I say different words inside my head.  The symphony of

reading multiple biographies comes out with this chorus in my head.

Wow-Jack/Wow-Jack/beeeeeeeatttttttitiffffffic terrific WOW - Jack

 

david rhaesa

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 09:33:56 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         Antoine Maloney <stratis@ODYSSEE.NET>

Subject:      Re: Gerry's Dad's story

 

Gerry,

 

        Thank you for the vivid post describing your dad's time in San

Francisco. It sounds like you did what too many of us neglect to do; really

quiz your Dad about his youth. Free advice to everyone on the list....ask

your mom and Dad and aunts and uncles and grandparents what their childhood,

adolescence, and coming of age was like; endlessly rewardimg as we can see!

 

        Was the aside about Lord Buckley a tip of the hat to my frequently

broadcast interest in the Lord, or did it just trip off your tongue? Any

evidence of Buckley intersecting with Kerouac or the others?  Charles

Plymell mentioned remembering Buckley from Los Angeles     ...days of the

old Crackerbox Palace. He was truly a hipster! I've read Kerouac's

description of seeing slim Gaillard, but have always been curious about any

awareness of Lord Buckley (especially given the close association with

Charlie Parker) and Harry 'the Hipster' Gibson ("Who Put the Benzedrine in

Mrs' Murpht's Ovaltine").

 

        Thanks again. Any idea who Navrotsky is or if I've spelt his name

correctly? The quotation as i heard it was attributed to them jointly. It's

a good one. Do you know Jo Grant? Is he / was he a labor organizer?

 

        Antoine

 Voice contact at  (514) 933-4956 in Montreal

 

     "An anarchist is someone who doesn't need a cop to tell him what to do!"

                        -- Norman Navrotsky and Utah Phillips

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 09:37:46 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         Rod Anstee <Nastees@AOL.COM>

Subject:      Re: Memory Babe Archive

 

Gerry, I think you are on more solid ground with this issue than the other.

There are huge chunks of your archive that are irreplaceable -- especially

the tape recordings, which must be preserved at all costs, even if the actual

access/rights issue isn't sorted out for years to come. Preserve the tapes at

least!

 

 (ASIDE: I can, for example, see that someone who had granted you an

interview back in the mid-1970's, might now be a bit surprised/troubled to

discover that the entire interview was potentially now available in complete

form, either audio or transcript, to the public -- that is, I can realize

that one of your interviewees might not have forseen such an eventuality when

they originally granted the interview as part of helping you with your book.

I say, I can sort of SEE someone feeling that way, though I imagine most of

the interviewees don't care either way, and if asked would readily grant

permission. I am thinking of someone like Helen Weaver, for example, who

might very well be writing her own memoirs of her time with JK, and therefore

not feel comfortable -- I pick Helen W. just as an hypothetical example

though, you understand.)

 

The original letters, too, even in 1987 deserved extra special treatment, and

it's appalling to think that they have somehow been allowed to disappear into

the void. (See, we can/do agree on some things!)

 

The xeroxed letters, on the other hand, present a difficult problem --

entirely aside from any Sampas angle. In a way I am quite surprised, in

retrospect, that Martha Mayo agreed to purchase these in the first place,

knowing that many of them (originals) are the property of other libraries.

Just as an example, I have in front of me a xerox of part of an 8 April, 1952

letter from JK to AG. It's a xerox you must have sent to me, and it's covered

with margin notes in your hand -- interesting, in and of themselves, as

pointers to the eventual text in MEMORY BABE -- but stamped on one edge are

the following words:

 

          " THIS IS A PHOTOCOPY OF ORIGINAL MATERIALS IN THE COLUMBIA

UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES.

 

         This copy must be returned to Special Collections (801 Butler

Library) at the completion of the reader's use."

 

 

Whilst it's arguable, I guess, that you haven't, as yet, completed your use

of this material, I'm pretty sure this statement on the document was actually

put there to preclude you (anyone) from subsequently SELLING it, at some

later date, to another institution --no? It renders your sale of such

material to the library in Lowell in 1987 somewhat dodgy. I even wonder if

this wasn't one of the reasons that most other insitutions you apporached

were not interested? (I assume your archive included this material -- on p.

35 of the list you sent me years ago, it lists "266 pages of letters of JK to

Allen Ginsberg"-- and I assume that comparable letters, from other libraries

came with similar restrictions.)

 

I guess I'm just suggesting that, in some respects at least, some of the

content of your MB archive is rather problematical, legally speaking. Of

course this in no way excuses any mishandling of the remainder of the

archive, or any (alleged) Sampas interference in the running of the archive

viv-a-vis scholarly access.

 

Just a thought. CHEERS Rod

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 09:35:14 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         "R. Bentz Kirby" <bocelts@SCSN.NET>

Organization: Law Office of R. Bentz Kirby

Subject:      David's post

 

David:

 

Thanks for the post.  I have reviewed most of the posts that I can find

on these issues and welcome receiving copies of older posts back channel

if anyone saved them.

 

On the issue of selling letters:

 

>From what you said, it was a "joke" that got turned around and out of

proportion.  I can see that happening and do not take issue with that.

But again, did Gerry sell photocopies to Umass at Lowell.  My impression

is that he sold his work and donated the rest as he had no right to sell

it.  If that is wrong, then I may be wrong, but in light of that

position, if I am correct noone may claim that Jerry sold Kerouac's

letters for gain.  He donated them.

 

On the archives, my concern is the lack of availability and deterioation

in the tapes.  That is a valid issue for us if we are to have free

information about Kerouac.

 

I am tired of draft talk on the Celtic list.  This thread is much

better.

 

Love you, mean it.

 

Peace,

 

--

Bentz

bocelts@scsn.net

 

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 09:44:39 -0400

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         Antoine Maloney <stratis@ODYSSEE.NET>

Subject:      David's Impressions

 

David,

 

        Thanks for your post summarizing your impressions of the estate

debate. It was excellent having neutral ground to test my own

recollections/impressions against.

 

        I'm hoping to get back quickly enough to the list to encourage Gerry

and the other comabattants to resist the temptation - great as it might be!

- to reply with "clarifications". I thinks id would help greatly to have

other "impressions' posted as well to see if we can't see the middle ground

that I'm sure exists - the "no man's land?"  Her's hoping!

 

        Thanks again.

 

                Antoine

 Voice contact at  (514) 933-4956 in Montreal

 

     "An anarchist is someone who doesn't need a cop to tell him what to do!"

                        -- Norman Navrotsky and Utah Phillips

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:44:14 -0500

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         RACE --- <race@MIDUSA.NET>

Subject:      Re: Gerry's Dad's story

 

Antoine Maloney wrote:

>

> Gerry,

>

>         Thank you for the vivid post describing your dad's time in San

> Francisco. It sounds like you did what too many of us neglect to do; really

> quiz your Dad about his youth. Free advice to everyone on the list....ask

> your mom and Dad and aunts and uncles and grandparents what their childhood,

> adolescence, and coming of age was like; endlessly rewardimg as we can see!

>

>         Was the aside about Lord Buckley a tip of the hat to my frequently

> broadcast interest in the Lord, or did it just trip off your tongue? Any

> evidence of Buckley intersecting with Kerouac or the others?  Charles

> Plymell mentioned remembering Buckley from Los Angeles     ...days of the

> old Crackerbox Palace. He was truly a hipster! I've read Kerouac's

> description of seeing slim Gaillard, but have always been curious about any

> awareness of Lord Buckley (especially given the close association with

> Charlie Parker) and Harry 'the Hipster' Gibson ("Who Put the Benzedrine in

> Mrs' Murpht's Ovaltine").

>

>         Thanks again. Any idea who Navrotsky is or if I've spelt his name

> correctly? The quotation as i heard it was attributed to them jointly. It's

> a good one. Do you know Jo Grant? Is he / was he a labor organizer?

>

>         Antoine

>  Voice contact at  (514) 933-4956 in Montreal

>

>      "An anarchist is someone who doesn't need a cop to tell him what to do!"

>                         -- Norman Navrotsky and Utah Phillips

 

I just saw my Dad Saturday night for the first time in months.  If I'd

read Gerry's story before that Pop would have probably got a good

quizzing.  I know that he used to hitch from Detroit to Sterling Kansas

and back for college in the early 1950s.  The few times I asked him

about it years ago - it brought no stories - just "it's what i had to

do, it was the only way I could afford to go back and forth."  But I've

also heard tell that my Ma's family in Northeastern Kansas thought my

Dad was too wild - so I have a feeling that there are stories in there

somewhere to be dug out ... :)  My brother will be up from Arizona in a

couple weeks and we'll be at my Dad's for our step-sister's wedding.

Perhaps we can gang tackle him and tie him up and force the stories out

of him.  Or I can tell him that if he doesn't fess up, I'll start

creating my own legends which he might not like to well and maybe that

will bring it out of him.  To hear him talk it wasn't that much

different than walking down to a dime store or something.  Maybe by the

early 50s that was true.  I really don't know cuz if I was around in

some former incarnation, my memory is cloudy.

 

I loved Gerry's story too !!!!!  Made me think of my Dad more than Jack

or Gerry's Dad but sometimes that's the way those stories go.

 

take care all,

 

david rhaesa

=========================================================================

Date:         Mon, 26 May 1997 08:57:55 -0500

Reply-To:     "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

Sender:       "BEAT-L: Beat Generation List" <BEAT-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

From:         RACE --- <race@MIDUSA.NET>

Subject:      Re: David's post

 

R. Bentz Kirby wrote:

>

> David:

>

> Thanks for the post.  I have reviewed most of the posts that I can find

> on these issues and welcome receiving copies of older posts back channel

> if anyone saved them.

>

> On the issue of selling letters:

>

> >From what you said, it was a "joke" that got turned around and out of

> proportion.  I can see that happening and do not take issue with that.

> But again, did Gerry sell photocopies to Umass at Lowell.  My impression

> is that he sold his work and donated the rest as he had no right to sell

> it.  If that is wrong, then I may be wrong, but in light of that

> position, if I am correct noone may claim that Jerry sold Kerouac's

> letters for gain.  He donated them.

 

i have no access to the formal agreements with Lowell U. to know whether

the package was divided between sale and donations.  while I know little

of this, i could understand sampas' concerns (a little) for letters

which are to be published in forthcoming collections.  but once again,

it seems that is something where all sense of proportion has been lost

and Jack's memory suffers for it.

>

> On the archives, my concern is the lack of availability and deterioation

> in the tapes.  That is a valid issue for us if we are to have free

> information about Kerouac.

 

Well it pisses me off - what to do though?  Unless part of the

sale/donation agreement required the Library to make these upgrades it

doesn't seem they can be forced to do so.  I've never thought much of

letter campaigns, but perhaps a letter campaign on that specific issue

would be worthwhile.

 

I also think Bill Gargan's notion of helping in gaining the permission

slips (somehow they remind me of high school "hall passes") seems worth

trying.

 

>

> I am tired of draft talk on the Celtic list.  This thread is much

> better.

 

This thread is full of rancor but that one is full of textbook cases of

delusional thought.  we must pick our poisons carefully .... )

 

I'm off to read another forty or so in Dharma Lion then back to Memory

Babe for around 75-100 pages.

 

Memorial Day

 

What do we remember on a

day

sanctified by the State

for remembrances?

 

Do we remember the soldiers

lost in foreign wars

and relatives we never

met?

Certainly, these are appropriate

remembrances.

 

But my notions of remembrance

are more twisted.

I remember the families

I created in

the Mental Hospitals

where all were

lonely

and all seemed to

breakdown

at Holiday after

Holiday.

 

I remember the

friends I've had

for years

who I never

met

in life

but know

deeply

in my

connection

and

identification

with their

words.

 

I put Skeletons

on the CD

player

and

I

sit back in

my rusty

recliner

and

attempt

to remember

scenes

from life

that seem

so far away

friends

from here

and there

scattered

victims of our own

insanities

and I

remember

most of all

that

God is Pooh Bear.

 

David Rhaesa

salina, Kansas

 



back